股四头肌腱、腘绳肌腱与骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物用于ACL重建的临床疗效：随机对照试验的Meta分析
简介
该荟萃分析纳入11项I/II级随机对照试验（随访2-10年），比较股四头肌腱（QT）、腘绳肌腱（HT）与骨-髌腱-骨（BPTB）自体移植物用于前交叉韧带重建（ACLR）的临床效果。关键发现：三种移植物在患者报告结局（IKDC评分平均84.8，Lysholm评分平均93.1）、膝关节稳定性（侧侧胫骨前移平均1.2 mm）、移植物失败率（0.7%）及同侧再手术率…
英文摘要
BACKGROUND: The quadriceps tendon (QT) has emerged as a reliable autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but uncertainty remains regarding several key comparative aspects-particularly donor-site morbidity, long-term graft survival, knee stability, and complication rates-when evaluated against hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. High-level evidence restricted to randomized controlled trials directly comparing QT with HT or BPTB remains limited. To compare clinical outcomes, graft failure, donor-site morbidity, and knee stability among QT, HT, and BPTB autografts for primary ACLR using level-I and level-II randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 1 September 2025, and repeated 2 weeks later. Only level-I or -II RCTs comparing QT to HT or BPTB in primary ACLR were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, instrumented laxity, graft failure, donor-site morbidity, and reoperation. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2.0, and small-study effects with funnel and doi plots. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (mean follow-up, 2-10 years) were included. Pooled IKDC scores averaged 84.8 (95% CI 81.9-87.9) and Lysholm scores averaged 93.1 (95% CI 91.6-94.6), with no significant differences between QT and either comparator (P > 0.05). Side-to-side anterior tibial translation averaged 1.2 mm (95% CI 0.99-1.54 mm) across all grafts, also without significant differences (P > 0.05). Pooled graft failure and ipsilateral reoperation rates were 0.7% (95% CI 0.0-1.9%) and 2.3% (95% CI 0.6-4.7%), respectively, again with no between-graft differences (P > 0.05). Donor-site morbidity did not differ significantly between QT and HT (mean 13.83 [95% CI 9.6-19.83]; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of level-I/II randomized controlled trials found no statistically significant differences among quadriceps tendon, hamstring tendon, and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in patient-reported outcomes, knee stability, graft re-rupture, or additional knee surgery. Donor-site morbidity comparisons were limited by incomplete reporting, particularly for BPTB. These findings suggest that contemporary surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols may minimize graft-specific differences in mid-term outcomes, although interpretation should consider the limited number of direct comparative trials across all three graft types. Level of evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis; level of evidence, 1 and 2.