前交叉韧带重建术后运动恐惧症的证据映射：范围综述
简介
这项范围综述纳入145项在ACLR后使用TSK评估运动恐惧症的研究，发现证据以高收入国家的横断面研究为主，纵向研究有限，青少年和女性代表性不足，样本量和参与者特征差异较大。研究涉及运动恐惧症与个人、临床、功能和神经生理变量之间的关系；干预研究很少，涉及认知行为、教育、物理和多模式策略，且仅2项研究对TSK进行了ACLR特异性改编。该综述提供了ACLR后运动恐…
英文摘要
OBJECTIVE: This review identified, synthesized, and mapped the scientific evidence on kinesiophobia, as assessed by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), to provide clinicians with a comprehensive evidence map. INTRODUCTION: Kinesiophobia can negatively impact rehabilitation and return-to-sport outcomes after ACLR. Despite its clinical relevance, the available evidence is fragmented, making it challenging for clinicians to find clear answers to their clinical questions and apply findings consistently in practice. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We considered studies that assessed kinesiophobia using the TSK in individuals of any age or sex following ACLR, regardless of sport participation or geographical setting. Included sources comprised peer-reviewed primary and secondary research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), and MEDLINE (EBSCOhost) databases up to September 2025. Research alerts were then maintained throughout the review process to identify newly published studies. A framework synthesis approach was adopted, whereby studies were systematically charted across 10 thematic domains, reflecting how kinesiophobia has been investigated in ACLR. RESULTS: A total of 145 studies were included in this review. Most were cross-sectional and conducted in high-income countries, while longitudinal studies were limited. Adolescents and females were underrepresented, and the sample sizes and participant characteristics varied widely. Kinesiophobia was examined in relation to personal, clinical, functional, and neurophysiological variables. Intervention studies were scarce but explored cognitive-behavioral, educational, physical, and multimodal strategies for managing kinesiophobia. Only 2 studies adapted the TSK specifically for ACLR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians now have access to a structured map of the evidence on kinesiophobia post-ACLR, which may inform clinical reflection. Future research should address methodological limitations and expand investigations in underrepresented populations and contexts. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/dh4jk/JK.